From observability to governance.
Portkey offers solid observability and a unified API across 1600+ models. DVARA is governance-first across 14+ providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Bedrock, Mistral, Cohere, Groq, Azure OpenAI, Ollama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Moonshot, ChatGLM, Grok), and the provider count is not the model count: /v1/models queries each configured provider live and returns the union of their catalogues — 84 chat models on a stock gateway with only OpenAI and Anthropic configured (measured, August 2026). With Policy-as-Code, tamper-evident audit trails, MCP tool call governance, and enterprise compliance.
Read from Portkey's own documentation on 28 August 2026. A comparison in which we win everything is a marketing asset, not a comparison — so this is the part we would rather you knew before choosing.
Source: portkey.ai
DVARA leads or ties every row in this table — Portkey does not come out ahead on any of them. That is unusual enough that you should check it rather than take it on trust: these rows are the capabilities we built the product around, so they are the ones we chose to compare, and a table chosen by us is not a neutral survey. Portkey is likely to be the better tool where its own strengths lie — read its documentation alongside this.
| Feature | DVARA | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-provider unified API | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSE streaming support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured outputs across providers | ✓ | ∼ |
| Capability-aware route filtering | ✓ | — |
| Circuit breaker per provider | ✓ | ∼ |
| Canary routing + A/B testing | ✓ | — |
Portkey has observability for engineers. DVARA has governance for compliance teams, CISOs, and regulated industries.
| Feature | DVARA | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Policy-as-Code engine (YAML DSL) | ✓ | — |
| Policy dry-run before activation | ✓ | — |
| Tamper-evident HMAC-signed audit trail | ✓ | — |
| PII detection and redaction | ✓ | ∼ |
| SOC2 / HIPAA / GDPR evidence packages | ✓ | ∼ |
| EU data residency enforcement | ✓ | — |
| Prompt firewall + jailbreak detection | ✓ | ✓ |
Portkey ships an MCP Gateway. DVARA pairs an MCP gateway with per-tool policy, approval gates, agent loop detection, signed audit, and per-tool cost attribution — a fuller agentic governance surface.
| Feature | DVARA | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| MCP tool calls proxied and governed | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP PII scan on arguments + responses | ✓ | ∼ |
| MCP server registry + credential store | ✓ | ✓ |
| Human approval gate (enforced at execution) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent loop detection + auto-kill | ✓ | — |
| Agent-to-agent (A2A) hop governance | ✓ | — |
| Session timeline (LLM + MCP unified) | ✓ | ∼ |
| Feature | DVARA | Portkey |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted / on-prem deployment | ✓ | ∼ |
| Air-gapped deployment | ✓ | ∼ |
| SSO via OIDC / SAML 2.0 | ✓ | ∼ |
| RBAC access control | ✓ | — |
| Multi-region active-active | ✓ | — |
| Kubernetes Helm chart | ✓ | ∼ |
Portkey is a capable LLM gateway with governance features. DVARA differentiates on agentic depth — per-tool MCP policy, approval gates, signed-audit chain integrity — and on running in your own infrastructure under predictable annual licensing rather than a metered SaaS bill. For teams whose compliance posture leans on a tamper-evident audit chain or whose agent workloads need first-class tool-call governance, DVARA is the deeper option.
Ready to migrate? See the step-by-step guide.
Run the LLM Gateway free in your own infrastructure, production included — a licence when you need the MCP and A2A planes with support.
The Portkey column describes what Portkey's public documentation said when we read it in June 2026 — a dash means we did not find the capability documented, not that the product cannot do it. Vendors ship continuously; check their docs before deciding. The DVARA column is a claim about our own code and is verified against the released tag.