Skip to main content

DVARA · AI Governance in the request path

AI Agent Production-Readiness Scorecard

Fifteen controls, five categories, about five minutes. Governance either sits in the request path — between the caller and the model — or it lives in a slide deck and doesn't count. Answer honestly: a Not sure you can't resolve in five minutes is itself the finding.

Free & self-scored~5 minutesNothing you answer leaves your browser
caller◇ governance gatemodel
0/15
Answered
0
Gaps
0 no · 0 unknown
Not started
Standing
1

Visibility & Authentication

— / 3

Can you see every AI call, and does each one carry an identity? You can't govern what you can't see.

1.1

Can you produce a current list of every app, service, and agent calling an LLM in production — and which model each one uses?

1.2

Is every LLM and tool call authenticated, so you can name which app or agent made it (not just “traffic from the cluster”)?

1.3

When an agent calls another agent or a tool, is that invocation identified and authorized — not just an open internal hop?

2

Cost Governance

— / 3

The meter nobody turned off. Providers bill per token; a looping agent can burn thousands overnight with no one watching.

2.1

Is there a hard spend cap enforced in the request path — one that actually blocks calls — not just a dashboard alert after the fact?

2.2

Are budgets scoped per app / team / agent, so one runaway can't drain the shared bill?

2.3

Can an agent that loops or retries be auto-killed before the invoice lands, rather than discovered on next month's statement?

3

Audit & Provability

— / 3

Governance answers the auditor: who authorized this, were they allowed, and can you prove it later.

3.1

Is there a tamper-evident record of every AI call — prompt, model, caller, cost, outcome — that a reviewer could trust six months from now?

3.2

Given any past request, can you reconstruct who authorized it and what it was permitted to do at that moment?

3.3

Are these logs held outside the reach of the teams and services that generate them, so the record can't be quietly edited?

4

Agency & Blast Radius

— / 3

The difference between AI that says things and AI that does things. The second is where the money and the databases are.

4.1

Do agents hold only the permissions their task needs — read-only where reading is the job — rather than broad credentials that also let them write, move money, or delete?

4.2

Do consequential actions (payments, data mutations, external sends) pass a human approval gate before they execute?

4.3

If an agent is confused or compromised, is its blast radius bounded by design — caps, gates, kill switch — rather than “we’d catch it in review”?

5

Data Residency & Compliance Exposure

— / 3

Hand data to something whose whole job is to produce text, and you can lose control of where it lives.

5.1

Do you know, per call, whether customer or regulated data leaves your perimeter — and where it lands when it does?

5.2

Are model keys and sensitive data kept inside your boundary (self-hosted / BYOK) rather than living in a third party's logs under their retention policy?

5.3

Can you map your AI controls to the regime you answer to (EU data residency, sector rules, OWASP LLM Top 10) well enough to survive an audit or a security questionnaire?

Your standing

Answer the sheet to see where you stand

Every No and every Not sure counts as a gap. The band updates live as you answer.

Email me my results + the remediation checklist

Get your standing, a per-category gap map, and a one-page checklist of what to close first — sent to your inbox. We'll only use it to send this and, if you scored 3+, to offer the deeper audit.

This is the teaser diagnosis — not the diagnosis.

It shows roughly where the holes are. It doesn't test whether your controls hold under load, adversarial input, or an auditor's questions. Scored 3 or higher? The AI Agent Production-Readiness Audit gives you findings ranked by risk, a gap map against a reference control architecture, and a remediation roadmap your team can execute. Fixed scope, fixed price, starts within a week.

Book a 30-minute scope call →

Independent of the DVARA product. Where DVARA would help, we'll say so plainly — you're never obligated to buy it. Prefer email? support@dvarahq.com.

Categories map to the failure modes that put agents in the headlines: Shadow AI (visibility), Unbounded Consumption (cost), Excessive Agency (blast radius), Sensitive Information Disclosure (residency) — OWASP LLM Top 10, 2025. Self-assessment only; nothing you enter leaves this page except the email you choose to submit.